Choosing between LLM providers
The five factors
When picking a provider:
- Quality on your domain. Generic benchmarks rarely reflect your use case. Test.
- Cost per query. Per-token billing scales with usage.
- Latency. First-token latency plus full-response time.
- Compliance. SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR commitments.
- Data handling. "Not used for training" guarantee.
Major providers (2026)
Without endorsing any specifically:
- OpenAI. Broad model family, strong general performance.
- Anthropic. Claude family, strong reasoning and safety.
- Google. Gemini family, strong multimodal.
- Open-source. Llama, Mistral, Qwen via self-hosting or hosting providers.
Each has trade-offs.
Quality on your domain
Generic benchmarks (MMLU, HumanEval) don't tell you how a model handles your content.
How to test:
- Pick 30 representative queries from your real data.
- Send each to 3 to 5 models.
- Score per relevance, accuracy, tone.
Often the differences surprise. A "weaker" model may handle your specific domain better than a "stronger" one.
Cost comparison
Per 1 million tokens (input + output combined):
- Premium tier. $5 to $30.
- Mid-tier. $1 to $10.
- Open-source self-hosted. $0.10 to $2 (plus your infrastructure).
For a SaaS with 50,000 monthly queries averaging 500 tokens each:
- Premium. $125 to $750 per month.
- Mid-tier. $25 to $250.
- Open-source. Self-hosted infra dominates.
Latency
- Premium models. 500 ms to 2 seconds first-token.
- Smaller models. 200 ms to 800 ms.
- Self-hosted. Depends on your infrastructure.
For voice channel, lower latency matters. For email channel, less so.
Compliance commitments
Providers vary:
- SOC 2 Type II. Most major providers have it.
- HIPAA BAA. Available on enterprise plans for some providers.
- GDPR compliance. Standard for serious providers.
- Data residency (EU, US-only).** Varies.
For regulated industries: confirm compliance fits your needs.
Data handling commitments
Critical for B2B:
- "Not used to train shared models" should be in writing.
- Retention period of your prompts/responses.
- Sub-processor disclosure.
Some providers offer zero-retention modes for highest sensitivity.
Multi-provider strategy
Common patterns:
Pattern 1: primary plus fallback. Premium model primary; cheaper fallback if primary errors or rate-limits.
Pattern 2: per-use-case routing. Premium for complex queries; lighter for FAQ-style.
Pattern 3: regional routing. EU customers to EU-hosted; US to US-hosted.
About 50 to 70% of mature SaaS use multi-provider.
AskVault's approach
AskVault routes through a multi-provider layer:
- Free tier uses a fast, cost-effective model.
- Paid tiers use higher-capability models.
- Enterprise can bring their own model or pin a specific provider.
Configured under Model Selector.
Switching costs
Migrating between providers:
- Prompt tuning. Each provider has prompt-style preferences.
- Few-shot examples may need adjustment.
- Cost re-validation.
- Latency re-test.
About 1 to 2 weeks per provider switch for medium-complexity setup.
Common pitfalls
Picking based on benchmarks alone. Test on your real data.
Lock-in. Avoid provider-proprietary features. Stay portable.
Over-optimizing cost. A "cheap" model with 10% worse accuracy may cost more in support overhead than premium.
Ignoring data-handling fine print. Read the terms; verify "not for training".
FAQ
Should I always pick the cheapest?
For high-volume low-stakes, yes. For high-stakes (legal, medical), premium.
Will providers change pricing?
Yes regularly. Monitor; switch costs typically pay back in 6 to 12 months.
Can I switch mid-deployment?
Yes. About 1 to 2 weeks of re-testing required.